What is proof of global warming?

It is not scientifically right although investigating with mean temperature is common.
In 2 ℃ air, if wet-bulb temperature is 0 ℃, snowflakes do not melt.
This is an observation fact.
It is not appropriate that the following value discusses warming.

Average value of the temperature of many different places.

I think that we should use the energy density of air.

It is rare to treat energy density in meteorology.

1.Energy which melts 1 g of ice
It is review of fundamental physics here.
It is said that the heat of fusion of water is 335 (kJ/kg).

335kJ of energy is necessary to ice into water of 0 ℃ 1 kg.

I think our A and B boxes of 1 cubic meter volume, and two ice 1g of 0 ℃.
Air temperature Ta 1mol contains the A.
Air temperature Tb contains 0.5mol The B.
I put ice in the box.
The air and the water I became 0 ℃ after a while, all the ice melts into water.

I'll try to calculate the value Ta, of Tb.

Main component of the air is nitrogen and oxygen.

Degrees of freedom of nitrogen and oxygen are 5.

Specific heat at constant volume of 1 mole of air is Cv = (5/2) R=.2.5 ×8.3143 ≒ 20.8 (J / mol)

Energy that flows into the ice from the air is as follows: A.
Cv × (Ta-0) = 20.8 × Ta (J)
Energy that flows into the ice from the air of B is as follows.

0.5 × Cv × Tb-0) 8 = 10.4 × Tb (J)

The energy which melts 1 g of ice is 335J.
Ta and Tb are as follows.
20.8xTa (J) =335 (J)
10.4xTb (J) =335 (J)
Ta≒16.1 (℃) =289.3 (K)

Tb≒32.2 (℃) =304.4 (K)

Although A becomes higher 16 ℃ than B, the quantity of the melting ice is the same.

Thus, the average value of the temperature of A and B does not have a scientific meaning.

　

2. The 0℃ atmosphere and the 20℃ atmosphere

Let’s compare the atmosphere of the next two.

The atmosphere whose ground pressure and temperature is 1000 hPa at 0 ℃.

The atmosphere whose ground pressure and temperature is 1000 hPa at 20 ℃.

.

The atmospheric pressure of height Z is as follows.

P (Z) = P0exp-∫ (mg / RT (Z ')) dZ'

Integration range is from 0 to Z.

 0 ℃ of atmospheric pressure is as follows.

20 ℃ of atmospheric pressure is as follows.

 It can hardly distinguish.

The energy of 1 mol of air which it has is as follows.
mgZ+CpT=Const
mgZ is potential energy, and CpT is enthalpy.
The equation of state of 1 mol of ideal gas is as follows.
PV=RT

Energy density is as follows.

(P/RT)mgZ+Cp(P/R)

The former is potential energy density and the latter is enthalpy density.

Enthalpy density comparison is the same as comparing the atmospheric pressure P.

The next is the graph which pulled the pressure of 20 ℃ from the pressure of 0 ℃.

It can be judged from a graph that the enthalpy density of 20 ℃ is large.

By warming, the height B1 to which an atmospheric pressure difference becomes large exists.

Pressure difference that became the largest is 30.7hPa of 8250m.

Let’s compare 0℃ and 20℃ mass density.

A1 was 16500 m, and -0.025kg/㎥.
B1 is 8250 m.

There is height which guesses warming also about potential energy density.

The energy which carried out warming is saved up also as potential energy of an air parcel.

Let’s compare 0℃ and 1℃

The 1.5hPa pressure difference appeared among 5000 to 10000 m.

Let’s compare 0℃ and 0．1℃

A1　16500m　－0.025kg/㎥

A2　15950m　－0.0013 kg/㎥

A3　15950ｍ　－0.00013 kg/㎥

B1　8250ｍ　－30.7hPa

B2　8000m  　－1.6hPa

B3　8000m　　－0.16hPa

0 ℃ of water was 0 ℃ of ice, and air also became 0 ℃.
The temperature before putting in ice is as following.
A was 16.1 ℃.

B was 32.2 ℃.

＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊

Nuclear power generation and Greenhouse effect

Greenhouse effect has infringed the 2nd law.
And the principle of conservation of energy is also infringed.
For example, suppose that a marine temperature went up by warming by 1℃.
Greenhouse effect cannot explain the immense energy which raises 1℃ of marine temperature.

Scholars ignore such a basic law and assert Greenhouse effect for nuclear power plant promotion.

They have not calculated the energy density of air.
The definition of their potential temperature is wrong.
Even the scientific proof of warming is not acquired.
They did not inquire, either but have only said "Propel nuclear power plants."
Where on earth did their curiosity go?
And we seem to be the selfish children who think as follows.

Warming is not carried out even if it consumes energy by Nuclear power generation.

The mystery in which greenhouse effect is allowed

Let's check that it is fundamental about temperature.
The temperature of air is the average of the kinetic energy of air particles.
Air particles have potential energy and kinetic energy.
The next can be said from a principle of conservation of energy.

Kinetic energy will become small if potential energy becomes large.

If it goes high up in the sky, temperature will fall.
The temperature of air is dependent on gravity.
The air of the earth also has the latent heat by vapor.

This complicates structure of the atmosphere of the earth.

On the other hand, Venus does not have most water.
It can approximate by kinetic energy and potential energy.
If it approaches 100 m on the surface of Venus, it is a rate which 1℃ temperature goes up.
Those with about 50 km and 500℃ difference in temperature are required between clouds and the surface.

One hot in the surface of Venus is for this.

Now, the basis of greenhouse effect is as follows.
The thing whose temperature of surface of the earth is higher than radiation equilibrium temperature is for greenhouse effect.
However, there is no basis which radiation equilibrium temperature makes the temperature of earth surface.
Please consider the surface of a gas planet to be somewhere.

We believe such unscientific explanation.

The surface is about 6500 km from the center of the earth.
Radiation equilibrium temperature is not related to the distance from the center of the earth.
It will be set to 0 if radiation equilibrium temperature is differentiated from the distance R from the center.
Radiation equilibrium temperature is a value fixed regardless of R.
The high school student who studied differentiation and physics can understand this.
Radiation equilibrium temperature has disregarded the influence of gravity.

Although it is not believed, this is a fundamental physics level of meteorology.

Greenhouse effect is a trick for promoting a nuclear power plant.
Is it necessary why to propel a nuclear power plant?
It is for processing plutonium and uranium of nuclear weapons curtailed tens of thousands of shots.
It is made to process in the nuclear power plant in Asia.
The name of the military operation is nuclear peaceful use.

Therefore, Greenhouse effect is required.

A method passes a research cost to the scholar who studies Greenhouse effect, and gives scientific authority to Greenhouse effect.

Scholars get social standing and pretend that there is a scientific basis.

Or since a research cost can be got, it believes firmly.

A nuclear power plant group of promoters uses greenhouse effect.
The United States is not building the nuclear power plant for 30 years or more.
It is because it turns out that it fails.
It is clear that they have technical capabilities.
However, it is Japan and South Korea that make a nuclear power plant to Asia.

When a breakdown becomes actual, it becomes Japan and South Korea to have promoted atomic power.

It seems that we cannot escape the influence of the military operation of the name called nuclear peaceful use.